Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Login     Signup
P-ISSN: 2522-6614, E-ISSN: 2522-6622
Peer Reviewed Journal | Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

2025, Vol. 9, Issue 6, Part J

Ultrasonographic placental thickness as a biometric predictor of neonatal outcomes: Evidence from a tertiary care cross-sectional study
Author(s): Tanvi Chaudhary and Shruti Paliwal
Abstract:

Background: The placenta's structural integrity fundamentally governs fetal well-being, yet the clinical utility of ultrasonographic placental thickness (PT) in predicting immediate neonatal outcomes remains inadequately characterized in resource-limited settings. While conventional fetal biometry exhibits diminished accuracy near term, placental thickness offers a reproducible biometric parameter that may enhance prognostic precision.

Objectives: This study evaluated the predictive value of ultrasonographic placental thickness measured at 36-40 weeks of gestation for neonatal birth weight and APGAR scores, while examining the potential influence of maternal gravida status on placental dimensions.

Material and Methods: A cross-sectional investigation was conducted across 112 antenatal women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at a tertiary obstetric facility in Central India. Placental thickness was measured sonographically at the umbilical cord insertion level between 36-40 weeks, with subsequent correlation to birth weight and 0-minute APGAR scores. Statistical analysis utilized SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp.), with significance set at p< 0.05.

Results: The median placental thickness was 3.4 cm (interquartile range 2.8-3.8 cm). Placental thickness exceeding 4.0 cm demonstrated a robust association with low birth weight (<2.5 kg, p< 0.001) and depressed APGAR scores (<7, p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cut-off of 4.35 cm, yielding 93.33% specificity and 98.00% negative predictive value for adverse neonatal outcomes. Maternal gravida status showed no significant correlation with placental dimensions.

Conclusion: Ultrasonographic placental thickness at term constitutes a reliable, readily obtainable biometric parameter for stratifying neonatal risk. A thickness exceeding 4.0 cm should prompt heightened vigilance for growth restriction and neonatal compromise, warranting integration into routine third-trimester surveillance protocols.

Pages: 1475-1479 | 88 Views | 32 Downloads
Download Full Article: Click Here


International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
How to cite this article:
Tanvi Chaudhary, Shruti Paliwal. Ultrasonographic placental thickness as a biometric predictor of neonatal outcomes: Evidence from a tertiary care cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2025;9(6):1475-1479. DOI: 10.33545/gynae.2025.v9.i6j.1818
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology


Embase Indexed Journal
Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
× Journals List Click Here Research Journals Research Journals