Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Login     Signup
P-ISSN: 2522-6614, E-ISSN: 2522-6622
Peer Reviewed Journal | Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

2026, Vol. 10, Issue 1, Part A

Maternal obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m² by Asian Indian criteria) and fetomaternal outcomes: A prospective comparative study
Author(s): Kelina H Dave, Usha Bohra and Vandana Sinha
Abstract:

Background: Maternal obesity is increasingly common and is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Asian Indian BMI criteria classify obesity at a lower cut-off (BMI ?25 kg/m²), which may better reflect metabolic risk in this population.

Objective: To compare maternal, obstetric, postpartum, and neonatal outcomes between obese pregnant women (BMI ?25 kg/m²) and non-obese pregnant women (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²) using Asian Indian BMI criteria.

Material and Methods: A prospective comparative observational study was conducted at Apollo Hospitals International Ltd., Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India over an 18-month period. A total of 100 antenatal women were enrolled and grouped as obese (n=50) and non-obese (n=50). Maternal outcomes assessed included pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), PROM, preterm labour, postpartum haemorrhage, induction of labour, and mode of delivery (LSCS). Postpartum wound status was evaluated. Neonatal outcomes included gestational age at birth, birth weight, APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, and NICU admission. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test and continuous variables using independent t-test, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Results: Obese women had significantly higher rates of PIH (8% vs 2%; p<0.001) and GDM (10% vs 2%; p=0.002). PROM (4% vs 2%; p=0.841), preterm labour (32% vs 22%; p=0.129), induction of labour (22% vs 20%; p=0.505), and LSCS (68% vs 52%; p=0.166) were higher in obese women but not statistically significant. Booking SBP and DBP after 20 weeks were significantly higher in obese women. Postpartum stitch line was healthy in most participants (92% obese vs 98% non-obese). Neonatal outcomes were comparable for gestational age, birth weight, and APGAR; NICU admission was higher in the obese group (18% vs 4%) but not statistically significant (p=0.238).

Conclusion: Using Asian Indian BMI criteria, maternal obesity was strongly associated with increased risk of PIH and GDM, while most neonatal outcomes remained comparable. Early risk identification and intensified antenatal surveillance for hypertensive disorders and dysglycaemia are recommended for obese gravidas.
Pages: 47-53 | 101 Views | 54 Downloads
Download Full Article: Click Here


International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
How to cite this article:
Kelina H Dave, Usha Bohra, Vandana Sinha. Maternal obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m² by Asian Indian criteria) and fetomaternal outcomes: A prospective comparative study. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2026;10(1):47-53. DOI: 10.33545/gynae.2026.v10.i1a.1854
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology


Embase Indexed Journal
Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
× Journals List Click Here Research Journals Research Journals