Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Login     Signup
P-ISSN: 2522-6614, E-ISSN: 2522-6622
Peer Reviewed Journal | Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

2026, Vol. 10, Issue 1, Part D

Hysteroscopy and mirena insertion: An alternative to hysterectomy in abnormal uterine bleeding
Author(s): Deepti N Mahoorkar, Anuradha Panda, Nivya K, Anup Prakash Bidarahalli and Nagalla Balakrishna
Abstract:

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common complaint in women. It is physically and psychologically disturbing. It causes deterioration of health and quality of life. Causes of HMB are adenomyosis, fibroids, polyps, endometrial hyperplasia etc. Most patients seek for hysterectomy. Hysteroscopy and Mirena insertion can be a definite alternative. Hence this study was conducted with the objectives to evaluate the effectiveness of hysteroscopy followed by Mirena (levonorgestrel intrauterine system) insertion as an alternative to hysterectomy in women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB)/heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB).

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 115 patients from January 2021 to December 2021 at Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad. Patients underwent Hysteroscopy and Mirena insertion. Few patients (N=66) received Inj. Medroxy Progesterone acetate (MPA) 150mg post-operatively and remaining (N=49) did not receive any medication. All patients were followed up at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively. Results were taken based on relief in symptoms and any benefit in giving hormonal injection post operatively.

Results: At 1 month, 86.1% (99/115) patients were relieved. 90.9% (60/66) patients who received Inj.MPA post-operatively were relieved. P value was 0.083, though not significant but a trend can be established to use this medication post-operatively. The satisfaction rate was similar at 6months in both groups with P value of 0.921. At 1 year, 3 patients had no relief in symptoms and underwent Hysterectomy. Over all 97.4% (112/115) patients were symptomatically relieved.

Conclusion: Hysteroscopy showed the exact cause of bleeding and Mirena insertion reduced the problem. Most patients had irregular bleeding for 2 to 3 months for which they were reassured. Over all acceptance rate was high. Additional Inj.MPA post-operatively can be considered.
Pages: 266-269 | 144 Views | 68 Downloads
Download Full Article: Click Here


International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
How to cite this article:
Deepti N Mahoorkar, Anuradha Panda, Nivya K, Anup Prakash Bidarahalli, Nagalla Balakrishna. Hysteroscopy and mirena insertion: An alternative to hysterectomy in abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2026;10(1):266-269. DOI: 10.33545/gynae.2026.v10.i1d.1878
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology


Embase Indexed Journal
Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
× Journals List Click Here Research Journals Research Journals