Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Login     Signup
P-ISSN: 2522-6614, E-ISSN: 2522-6622
Peer Reviewed Journal | Embase Indexed Journal

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

2026, Vol. 10, Issue 1, Part D

Comparative evaluation of spinal versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective caesarean section
Author(s): P Kowsalya and S Kiran Kumar
Abstract:

Background: Neuraxial anaesthesia is the preferred technique for elective caesarean section. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia is widely used due to its rapid onset but is associated with hypotension and limited duration of analgesia. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia offers the advantage of an epidural catheter, which may improve haemodynamic stability and postoperative pain control. Evidence comparing these techniques under contemporary practice remains inconclusive.
Materials and Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 50 ASA I-II parturients scheduled for elective caesarean section were allocated to receive either spinal anaesthesia (Group S, N=25) or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (Group C, N=25). Primary outcomes included incidence and severity of hypotension and vasopressor requirement. Secondary outcomes were time to achieve T4 sensory block, need for intraoperative supplementation, maternal side effects, duration of effective postoperative analgesia, postoperative pain scores using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and maternal satisfaction.
Results: Baseline demographic and haemodynamic parameters were comparable between groups. Time to achieve T4 sensory block was shorter in Group S (4.2±0.8 min) than Group C (5.1±1.0 min). Hypotension occurred more frequently in Group S (56%) compared with Group C (36%), with higher vasopressor requirement (420±180 µg vs 280±140 µg; p<0.05). Intraoperative supplementation was required more often in Group S (20%) than Group C (8%). Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in Group C (6.8±1.4 h vs 3.4±0.9 h; p<0.001). Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower and maternal satisfaction higher in Group C (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia provides better haemodynamic stability, superior postoperative analgesia, and higher maternal satisfaction than spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section, despite a slightly slower onset of surgical block.

Pages: 311-317 | 86 Views | 37 Downloads
Download Full Article: Click Here


International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
How to cite this article:
P Kowsalya, S Kiran Kumar. Comparative evaluation of spinal versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2026;10(1):311-317. DOI: 10.33545/gynae.2026.v10.i1d.1892
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology


Embase Indexed Journal
Embase Indexed Journal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
× Journals List Click Here Research Journals Research Journals